Now read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
No, they are not the same.
Sure, the article itself has a bullet point that has the right facts 73% dark energy, 23% dark matter and 4% normal matter.
Unless I missed something, I don’t know where that 85% come from. Must be some new theory?
My guess is that a typo: matter vs mass.
Here is another one from Christian Science Monitor
Ayurveda and other traditional medical practitioners have known for thousands of years about the effects of food on the medicine we consume. Doctors who practiced western medicine said there is no scientific basis for such effects.
This article raises concern about how food and medicine interact:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704256304575320743052254682.html
At current rate, by tomorrow we should start seeing advertisements from zinc supplement makers trotting the benefit as cold cure. The first time I saw it was just a little help from the zinc. Now I am seeing this.
I am not saying anything else.
Texas conservatives have won a curriculum change. Read about it here.
I grew up in a country with strong socialist governance. It still is but the country suffered long enough that the government had to open the gates for capitalism. Only then the country started flourishing. The same you can say about China as well. They started progressing only after they allowed capitalism to take advantage of their cheap labor.
Back to our story. The following is my opinion based on my own observation of events occurred in my life time. I don’t practice any religion.
Back home we had a secular state. The state did not push the religious to the corner. They never felt threatened. Schools were free to teach religious text as a non science subject. I grew up reading religious text of all the religions in the region. That was not considered science but were not prohibited from teaching. That was the key. Kids separated science from religion early on. Both had their own place the society. I don’t remember anyone ever questioning the evolution when I was in K-12 in the 80′s. My parents didn’t either. Dinosaurs were as real as Adam and Eve.  I know it is hard for people in the US and most of the west to understand. That is because the conflict is too deep here.
Lot of schools were run by religious organizations. They did not force their beliefs on other people. They did have the option of learning more about it though.
That is just the part of the story. The more important aspect of the story is where there is similarity with what is going on in the US. We had a quota system. People of certain origin were given quotas in schools and jobs. This meant that qualified people from backgrounds that were considered influential could not get in to prestigious schools and jobs a lot of times. They had no choice but to look for private education which also had to implement the quota. Lot of them left the country and came to US and some western countries. I am not one of them. After over half a century of government sponsored inequality, these groups backlashed and took the office. They did not do a lot of damage but the message was clear.
The good way to promote secularism is to accommodate. Me and my parents religion was accommodated by the majority religion in the country. Scientific community accommodated the beliefs of the religions. Religions did not question the science. They were operating in different dimensions. Many large government offices had prayer places for all religions. Even the top scientific institutions promote religious harmony. Bottom line: religion was not ridiculed.
Most people have a need to believe in something. If it is not the established religions, they will look for other things to believe. It could be witch craft, vampires or aliens. We just keep moving from one to another when challenged. Only a handful people find no need to believe in any kind of supernatural or other worldly powers. Â When those people get the power and try push it on others, there will be friction. People may admire the accomplishment of these individuals but they would not sacrifice their beliefs for them. You may be able to educate them but that is only transient. Remember, almost a century of communism in the former Soviet Union did not eradicate such beliefs.
Let us all try to accommodate each others beliefs. There is no need to follow them but do not ridicule them or prevent them from following their beliefs. We all know that beliefs that harms others physically, economically or other ways need not be tolerated the state. The definition of those other ways should be very narrow and specific and agreeable to all the sides.